<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 12 Know More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.12knowmore.com</link>
	<description>Paleo, health, economics, politics and philosophy. Want to know more?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans, I have some bad news for you by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2010/11/30/americans-i-have-some-bad-news-for-you/#comment-7847</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=221#comment-7847</guid>
		<description>Like your blog! I agree in principle with your take on the ridiculous lifestyle in America. But, in fairness, when I ponder this issue myself I realize that in some ways the US system has enabled Europe&#039;s and other nations liberal vacation/good pay/saner situation. 

You mention great health care in other nations. How much of this was developed exclusive of American reasearch and american companies, fueled no doubt by the lucrative incentives of the rather brutal american style of capitalism? Im not saying all advances in health care are american, only that the rest of the world doesnt mind reaping the benefits of it.

How long would New Zealand keep its wonderful lifestyle and remain free without its american friends? Same with Europe. Think small nations dont need protection? Try  contrasting Poland 1939 with Europe today. Poland failed to align with Germany or Russia and paid the price. Europe at least in some part is able to provide such a high standard of living due to American friendship allowing them to not spend all their GNP on defence.  Someone has to be the muscle. I&#039;d personally prefer it was not the US, but the fact remains historically speaking, the strong swallow up the weak in geopolitics.

It has not failed to occur to me that the wirlwind advance in technology over the last  75 years or so, maybe just maybe, would not have thrived so well outside of a world without a country like the USA. Its unique combination of freedoms and its economic system was at the time, the right environment for 
unprecidented surge in technological advancement. Technology that has allowed the world population to surge while maintaining a higher standard of living.  Now I happen to think that America no longer holds any particular edge over many other parts of the world, and that the particular American form of capitalism that led to its acendency no longer remains. What exists now is sold to the public as the same but is really just a corrupt crony capitalism, easily recognizable to anyone familiar with post WWII Bannana republics. And time will produce the same results with it in America that those nations had. Poverty, violence, and crime.

I am frankly ashamed at times of what the US has become. But I&#039;m also not blind to the fact that sometimes its a lot easier for a smaller country to bask in the advantages of its larger friend, without having to get its hands dirty. The world is so dynamic and complex, I try to remember that its rarely as simple as our minds want to make it.

Keep up the good work,

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like your blog! I agree in principle with your take on the ridiculous lifestyle in America. But, in fairness, when I ponder this issue myself I realize that in some ways the US system has enabled Europe&#8217;s and other nations liberal vacation/good pay/saner situation. </p>
<p>You mention great health care in other nations. How much of this was developed exclusive of American reasearch and american companies, fueled no doubt by the lucrative incentives of the rather brutal american style of capitalism? Im not saying all advances in health care are american, only that the rest of the world doesnt mind reaping the benefits of it.</p>
<p>How long would New Zealand keep its wonderful lifestyle and remain free without its american friends? Same with Europe. Think small nations dont need protection? Try  contrasting Poland 1939 with Europe today. Poland failed to align with Germany or Russia and paid the price. Europe at least in some part is able to provide such a high standard of living due to American friendship allowing them to not spend all their GNP on defence.  Someone has to be the muscle. I&#8217;d personally prefer it was not the US, but the fact remains historically speaking, the strong swallow up the weak in geopolitics.</p>
<p>It has not failed to occur to me that the wirlwind advance in technology over the last  75 years or so, maybe just maybe, would not have thrived so well outside of a world without a country like the USA. Its unique combination of freedoms and its economic system was at the time, the right environment for<br />
unprecidented surge in technological advancement. Technology that has allowed the world population to surge while maintaining a higher standard of living.  Now I happen to think that America no longer holds any particular edge over many other parts of the world, and that the particular American form of capitalism that led to its acendency no longer remains. What exists now is sold to the public as the same but is really just a corrupt crony capitalism, easily recognizable to anyone familiar with post WWII Bannana republics. And time will produce the same results with it in America that those nations had. Poverty, violence, and crime.</p>
<p>I am frankly ashamed at times of what the US has become. But I&#8217;m also not blind to the fact that sometimes its a lot easier for a smaller country to bask in the advantages of its larger friend, without having to get its hands dirty. The world is so dynamic and complex, I try to remember that its rarely as simple as our minds want to make it.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work,</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An alternative to Left vs. Right in politics by Ilene Skeen</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/11/an-alternative-to-left-vs-right-in-politics/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilene Skeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=167#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>Before you can be called to sacrifice something, you have to have something to sacrifice. Since life is the fundamental value and thinking is the fundamental choice, any system which calls for sacrifice is the same as any other. Therefore, there is no triangle, because there are not three sides, only two: the sanctity of individual rights vs. the power of the state. 

In a true capitalist system, inividual rights are defended by the state, in all of the others, individual rights are sacrificed to the purposes of the state. To show anarchism as a system on the upper left of your triangle shows it as closer to capitalism than another other ism. First, anarchism is not a system, it is a denial of system, and second, it is mob, range of the moment rule on the premise that might makes right. Objective capitalism is the long-range rule of law in protection of individual rights. If you insist on preserving the triangle, then anarchism must be outside the triangle and  below all of the isms, as a sort of sea of chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you can be called to sacrifice something, you have to have something to sacrifice. Since life is the fundamental value and thinking is the fundamental choice, any system which calls for sacrifice is the same as any other. Therefore, there is no triangle, because there are not three sides, only two: the sanctity of individual rights vs. the power of the state. </p>
<p>In a true capitalist system, inividual rights are defended by the state, in all of the others, individual rights are sacrificed to the purposes of the state. To show anarchism as a system on the upper left of your triangle shows it as closer to capitalism than another other ism. First, anarchism is not a system, it is a denial of system, and second, it is mob, range of the moment rule on the premise that might makes right. Objective capitalism is the long-range rule of law in protection of individual rights. If you insist on preserving the triangle, then anarchism must be outside the triangle and  below all of the isms, as a sort of sea of chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An alternative to Left vs. Right in politics by The Ackbar Spectrum &#8212; The New Clarion</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/11/an-alternative-to-left-vs-right-in-politics/#comment-6614</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ackbar Spectrum &#8212; The New Clarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=167#comment-6614</guid>
		<description>[...] the OActivists list, Rick Kiessig linked this post at his blog 12 Know More, where he proposes a way to &#8220;fit&#8221; the idea of individual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the OActivists list, Rick Kiessig linked this post at his blog 12 Know More, where he proposes a way to &#8220;fit&#8221; the idea of individual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elizabeth Warren&#8217;s pitch for class warfare by david</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/26/elizabeth-warrens-pitch-for-class-warfare/#comment-6563</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=372#comment-6563</guid>
		<description>Is it possible she&#039;s referring to large corporations that get avoid paying taxes through offshore tax maneuvers. Or maybe she&#039;s referring to large corporations that get favorable tax treatment by lobbying the political powers-that-be. I&#039;ve read of cases where large retails were able to get favorable tax treatment and ultimately drive the local retailers out of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible she&#8217;s referring to large corporations that get avoid paying taxes through offshore tax maneuvers. Or maybe she&#8217;s referring to large corporations that get favorable tax treatment by lobbying the political powers-that-be. I&#8217;ve read of cases where large retails were able to get favorable tax treatment and ultimately drive the local retailers out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you take statins for high cholesterol? by HeartLIfe</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/09/would-you-take-statins-for-high-cholesterol/#comment-6460</link>
		<dc:creator>HeartLIfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=286#comment-6460</guid>
		<description>Oh really? So why did my total cholesterol go from 274 to 317 now that I am low carb? No grains or starchy carbs at all. I follow Atkins. I take fish oil.

It is NOT what you eat in most cases, anyway. Your liver produces most of the cholesterol in the body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh really? So why did my total cholesterol go from 274 to 317 now that I am low carb? No grains or starchy carbs at all. I follow Atkins. I take fish oil.</p>
<p>It is NOT what you eat in most cases, anyway. Your liver produces most of the cholesterol in the body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is pride a sin? by anne</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/01/08/why-is-pride-a-sin/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=246#comment-6414</guid>
		<description>Its less complicated than you might think.  It is unfortunate that English has only 1 word for this concept.  French makes a more subtle distinction between Fier (the kind of heart swelling pride you are talking about) and Orgueil (the obnoxious, self-absorbed, me-first kind).  The Judeo-Christian Pride which is considered a sin (one of the 7 Deadly Sins: Pride, Envy, Sloth, Greed, Anger, Lust &amp; Gluttony) is the act of violating the 1st commandment, putting one&#039;s self above God, the act of making one&#039;s self into an idol - in essence, a false god.  Hope that clarifies for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its less complicated than you might think.  It is unfortunate that English has only 1 word for this concept.  French makes a more subtle distinction between Fier (the kind of heart swelling pride you are talking about) and Orgueil (the obnoxious, self-absorbed, me-first kind).  The Judeo-Christian Pride which is considered a sin (one of the 7 Deadly Sins: Pride, Envy, Sloth, Greed, Anger, Lust &amp; Gluttony) is the act of violating the 1st commandment, putting one&#8217;s self above God, the act of making one&#8217;s self into an idol &#8211; in essence, a false god.  Hope that clarifies for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you take statins for high cholesterol? by simpleworld</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/09/would-you-take-statins-for-high-cholesterol/#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>simpleworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=286#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>The single most effective and quantifiable method for NATURALLY reducing LDL and raising HDL levels is through dietary carbohydrate reduction.  I had posted about this on the old GIM forum but basically if you reduce carb intake you will normalize your cholesterol levels.  Fish oil and Niacin appear to help as well.  

While i believe Dr. Pauling is correct, simply supplementing without ELIMINATING THE DIETARY FACTORS that cause cholesterol issues is not a solution.   First eliminate the cause of the problem (diet), then supplement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single most effective and quantifiable method for NATURALLY reducing LDL and raising HDL levels is through dietary carbohydrate reduction.  I had posted about this on the old GIM forum but basically if you reduce carb intake you will normalize your cholesterol levels.  Fish oil and Niacin appear to help as well.  </p>
<p>While i believe Dr. Pauling is correct, simply supplementing without ELIMINATING THE DIETARY FACTORS that cause cholesterol issues is not a solution.   First eliminate the cause of the problem (diet), then supplement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update on brushing my teeth with soap by simpleworld</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/14/update-on-brushing-my-teeth-with-soap/#comment-6232</link>
		<dc:creator>simpleworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=327#comment-6232</guid>
		<description>Greetings from another GIM guy!   You should try Dr. Bronners liquid soaps.

INGREDIENTS: Water, Saponified Organic Coconut*, Organic Palm* and Organic Olive* Oils (w/Retained Glycerin), Organic Hemp Oil, Organic Jojoba Oil, Essential Oils**, Citric Acid, Vitamin E 

I&#039;ve tried them for brushing, strong taste but very refreshing.  I use Bronners soap to wash my hair, laundry, dishes, wash dogs.....everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings from another GIM guy!   You should try Dr. Bronners liquid soaps.</p>
<p>INGREDIENTS: Water, Saponified Organic Coconut*, Organic Palm* and Organic Olive* Oils (w/Retained Glycerin), Organic Hemp Oil, Organic Jojoba Oil, Essential Oils**, Citric Acid, Vitamin E </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried them for brushing, strong taste but very refreshing.  I use Bronners soap to wash my hair, laundry, dishes, wash dogs&#8230;..everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An alternative to Left vs. Right in politics by Objectivist Round Up &#124; Roberto Sarrionandia</title>
		<link>http://www.12knowmore.com/index.php/2011/09/11/an-alternative-to-left-vs-right-in-politics/#comment-6138</link>
		<dc:creator>Objectivist Round Up &#124; Roberto Sarrionandia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.12knowmore.com/?p=167#comment-6138</guid>
		<description>[...] Kiessig presents An alternative to left vs. right in politics posted at 12 Know More. The article presents a diagram that describes political parties and systems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kiessig presents An alternative to left vs. right in politics posted at 12 Know More. The article presents a diagram that describes political parties and systems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.12knowmore.com @ 2012-02-23 16:31:21 -->
